linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:50:36 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <greg@...ah.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Manjunath GKondaiah <manjunath.gkondaiah@...aro.org>,
	Dilan Lee <dilee@...dia.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism

On Monday 26 September 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
> Actually, in the next iteration, I'm thinking it would be a good idea
> to create a new #define to only be used by probe deferral.  I want it
> to be easy to find all the drivers that are using this mechanism
> without needing to filter all the unrelated hits.  However, this is a
> kernel-only thing so it is probably not appropriate to add it to
> include/asm-generic/errno.h.  I could use some guidance/advice as to
> the best way to handle this.

include/linux/errno.h already has a bunch of kernel-internal error
codes that are never supposed to be seen in user space. Just
add one there, the next free one right now is 517, after
ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/