linux-kernel - Re: PME via interrupt or SCI mechanism?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:32:06 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Luming Yu <luming.yu@...il.com>
Cc:	Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, robert.moore@...el.com,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: PME via interrupt or SCI mechanism?

On Tuesday, September 27, 2011, Luming Yu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Sarah Sharp
> <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ok.  Do you have suggestions for any tests I can run or debugging
> > statements to add?  I'm really not an ACPI expert and I've been
> > basically fumbling in the dark.
> 
> The following patch from Shaohua might be useful to help debugging the problem.
> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-usb/2009/7/30/6251245

You probably don't realize that the patch is neither applicable nor
relevant any more, but it would be nice to check that before
recommending it to anyone, don't you think?

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/