linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] GIC OF bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:21:49 +0100
From:	Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>
To:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	grant.likely@...retlab.ca, marc.zyngier@....com,
	thomas.abraham@...aro.org, jamie@...ieiles.com, b-cousson@...com,
	shawn.guo@...aro.org, Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] GIC OF bindings

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:53:54PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
> 
> With recent patches for VIC device tree support and GIC MULTI_IRQ support,
> it is evident that the irq domain support should be moved into the core GIC
> code and not be dependent on the DT initialization. So I've split things up
> into 2 patches separating irq_domain and device-tree code.
> 
> This should only change the internals of the GIC code. The binding is
> unchanged from the previous version. Yeah!
> 
> The full series is available here. This includes Russell's devel-stable and
> for-next branches and Nico's vmalloc branch.

Looks good to me!

Reviewed-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/