linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/8] regmap: Ensure we scream if we enable cache bypass/only at the same time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:24:55 +0100
From:	Dimitris Papastamos <dp@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] regmap: Ensure we scream if we enable cache
	bypass/only at the same time

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:25:30AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:39:13AM +0100, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> 
> >  void regcache_cache_only(struct regmap *map, bool enable)
> >  {
> > +	BUG_ON(map->cache_bypass && enable);
> >  	mutex_lock(&map->lock);
> 
> I'd move these inside the lock otherwise there's an enable/enable race
> where two threads check that things are safe simultaneously.  I'd also
> change to WARN_ON(), if nothing else it's hard to see BUG_ON()s that
> occur prior to console output and PMICs are likely to trigger that sort
> of stuff.

Aw yes, of course :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/