linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5 v12] arm: omap: usb: ehci and ohci hwmod structures for omap3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:03:23 +0530
From:	"Munegowda, Keshava" <keshava_mgowda@...com>
To:	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
Cc:	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, balbi@...com, khilman@...com,
	b-cousson@...com, gadiyar@...com, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
	parthab@...ia.ti.com, tony@...mide.com, johnstul@...ibm.com,
	vishwanath.bs@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5 v12] arm: omap: usb: ehci and ohci hwmod structures
 for omap3

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> a few more comments
>
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, Keshava Munegowda wrote:
>>
>> > +static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if omap34xx_l4_cfg__usb_host_hs = {
>> > +   .master         = &omap3xxx_l4_core_hwmod,
>> > +   .slave          = &omap34xx_usb_host_hs_hwmod,
>> > +   .clk            = "l4_ick",
>> > +   .addr           = omap34xx_usb_host_hs_addrs,
>> > +   .user           = OCP_USER_MPU | OCP_USER_SDMA,
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if omap34xx_usb_host_hs__ick = {
>
> This is missing master, slave, and addr fields.  But see the comment
> below.
>
>> > +   .clk            = "usbhost_ick",
>> > +   .user           = OCP_USER_MPU,
>> > +   .flags          = OCPIF_SWSUP_IDLE,
>>
>> Does this really need OCPIF_SWSUP_IDLE?  If so, then there is a hardware
>> bug, and some explanation is needed.
>
> Could you describe why there are two struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if records
> here?  It seems to me that these should just be combined into one struct
> omap_hwmod_ocp_if record?  Looking at the clock3xxx_data.c file, the
> usbhost_ick struct clk has l4_ick as its parent, so l4_ick shouldn't need
> to be mentioned explicitly?


Thanks ! I will do this.



..
>
>> > +static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if omap34xx_f_cfg__usb_tll_hs = {
>> > +   .clk            = "usbtll_ick",
>> > +   .user           = OCP_USER_MPU,
>> > +   .flags          = OCPIF_SWSUP_IDLE,
>> > +};
>>
>> Does this really need OCPIF_SWSUP_IDLE?  If so, then there is a hardware
>> bug, and some explanation is needed.
>>
>> > +
>> > +static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if omap34xx_l4_cfg__usb_tll_hs = {
>> > +   .master         = &omap3xxx_l4_core_hwmod,
>> > +   .slave          = &omap34xx_usb_tll_hs_hwmod,
>> > +   .clk            = "l4_ick",
>> > +   .addr           = omap34xx_usb_tll_hs_addrs,
>> > +   .user           = OCP_USER_MPU | OCP_USER_SDMA,
>> > +};
>
> Same problem here.  Seems like omap34xx_l4_cfg__usb_tll_hs and
> omap34xx_f_cfg__usb_tll_hs should be combined into one record.

Thanks ! I will do this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/