lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:25:47 +0200
From:	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:	Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
Cc:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/21] drm/i915: Delay DP i2c initialization
 until panel power timings are computed

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 06:09:41PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> On eDP, DDC requires panel power, but turning that on uses the panel
> power sequencing timing values fetch from the DPCD data.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
Can't really check more than what the patch does what it claims to do, so
a weak:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>

And a small question from the clueless: With your patch
intel_dp_i2c_auch_ch checks whether panel or vdd is on, but I don't see
where we turn that on and the drm dp i2c core seems to do a few
transactions on setup time. Should we splatter a vdd_on/off around the
i2c_init or is the panel guaranteed to have power at init time?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@...ll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ