lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:22:59 +0400
From:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <paul@...lmenage.org>,
	<lizf@...fujitsu.com>, <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>,
	<jbottomley@...allels.com>, Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] provide a version of cpuusage statistics inside
 cpu cgroup

On 10/05/2011 01:46 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 23:21 +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * charge this task's execution time to its accounting group.
>> + *
>> + * called with rq->lock held.
>> + */
>> +static void cpuusage_charge(struct task_struct *tsk, u64 cputime)
>> +{
>> +       int cpu;
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT
>> +       struct cpuacct *ca;
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
>> +       struct task_group *tg;
>> +#endif
>> +       cpu = task_cpu(tsk);
>> +
>> +       rcu_read_lock();
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT
>> +       ca = task_ca(tsk);
>> +
>> +       if (unlikely(!cpuacct_subsys.active))
>> +               goto no_cpuacct;
>> +
>> +       for (; ca; ca = ca->parent) {
>> +               u64 *cpuusage = per_cpu_ptr(ca->cpuusage, cpu);
>> +               *cpuusage += cputime;
>> +       }
>> +no_cpuacct:
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
>> +       tg = task_group(tsk);
>> +       for (; tg; tg = tg->parent) {
>> +               u64 *cpuusage = per_cpu_ptr(tg->cpuusage, cpu);
>> +               *cpuusage += cputime;
>> +       }
>> +#endif
>> +       rcu_read_unlock();
>> +}
>
> I don't actually think we need to do this. tg->se[cpu]->sum_exec_runtime
> should contain the same information.

Well,

We should at least sum up se and rt_se, right?
Otherwise... I will re-read the code, but from a first sight, I think 
you are right.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ