| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:38:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org>, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] fat: Batched discard support for fat On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org> writes: > > > Hi Ogawa, > > Hi, > > > Do you still object to merge batched discard support on fat? > > > > If the current batched discard concept doesn't changed, it can't merge it? > > I'm not blaming "concept". I'm saying current implements (and due to > current interface confusion) is confusing and makes userland hard to use it. > > I really think I explained all my concerns and current implement > confusion. > > Last time I checked, those implementations had even the different error > code at EOF. How can I say your implement will work without knowing > right implement? > > Again, it is reason, and I'm not blaming "concept" or your implement > itself. > > Thanks. Please see test #260 in xfstests, which was recently added to check for common mistakes in FITRIM argument handling. Thanks! -Lukas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists