lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:09:44 +0200
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm-soc tree

On 10/06/2011 02:13 AM, Stephen Rothwell :
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 09:40:12 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> wrote:
>> 
>> On Tuesday 04 October 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> After merging the arm-soc tree, today's linux-next build
>>> (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>> 
>>> ERROR: "clk_enable" [drivers/misc/atmel_pwm.ko] undefined! 
>>> ERROR: "clk_disable" [drivers/misc/atmel_pwm.ko] undefined! 
>>> ERROR: "clk_put" [drivers/misc/atmel_pwm.ko] undefined! ERROR:
>>> "clk_get_rate" [drivers/misc/atmel_pwm.ko] undefined! ERROR:
>>> "clk_get" [drivers/misc/atmel_pwm.ko] undefined!
>>> 
>>> Caused by commit 9dccc010c816 ("ARM: at91: remove dependency
>>> for Atmel PWM driver selector in Kconfig").
>>> 
>>> I have used the arm-soc tree from next-20110930 for today.
>> 
>> Ah, thanks for tracking this down. I actually noticed the same 
>> problem on an ARM build but did not realize it was from one of 
>> the patches I had jut put in there myself.
>> 
>> I'm really glad I didn't send this to Linus cc:stable yet then. 
>> Nicolas, in my randconfig branch, I've fixed this by adding
>> 
>> depends on HAVE_CLK
>> 
>> which I think is the right solution. I'll replace your patch with
>> one that does this if you don't mind.
>> 
>> I'd also remove the stable tag for this patch, because it can 
>> have unintended side-effects on other architectures.
> 
> I am still getting the failure ...

Well, on my side, applying Arnd's correction, I can run a x86_64
allmodconfig without this error.

With this new dependency it seems impossible to even select the driver.

Do you have a link to a log of this failure? Have the .config been
re-generated?

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ