lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri,  7 Oct 2011 16:17:22 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>, aarcange@...hat.com,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mm: vmscan: Limit direct reclaim for higher order allocations

From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>

When suffering from memory fragmentation due to unfreeable pages,
THP page faults will repeatedly try to compact memory.  Due to the
unfreeable pages, compaction fails.

Needless to say, at that point page reclaim also fails to create
free contiguous 2MB areas.  However, that doesn't stop the current
code from trying, over and over again, and freeing a minimum of 4MB
(2UL << sc->order pages) at every single invocation.

This resulted in my 12GB system having 2-3GB free memory, a
corresponding amount of used swap and very sluggish response times.

This can be avoided by having the direct reclaim code not reclaim from
zones that already have plenty of free memory available for compaction.

If compaction still fails due to unmovable memory, doing additional
reclaim will only hurt the system, not help.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
---
 mm/vmscan.c |   10 ++++++++++
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index b55699c..3817fa9 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2066,6 +2066,16 @@ static void shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
 				continue;
 			if (zone->all_unreclaimable && priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
 				continue;	/* Let kswapd poll it */
+			if (COMPACTION_BUILD) {
+				/*
+				 * If we already have plenty of memory free
+				 * for compaction, don't free any more.
+				 */
+				if (sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER &&
+					(compaction_suitable(zone, sc->order) ||
+					 compaction_deferred(zone)))
+					continue;
+			}
 			/*
 			 * This steals pages from memory cgroups over softlimit
 			 * and returns the number of reclaimed pages and
-- 
1.7.3.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ