| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 13:02:45 -0700 From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> Cc: Víctor Manuel Jáquez Leal <vjaquez@...lia.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Timo Teras <timo.teras@...idboot.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] omap: dmtimer: convert printk to pr_err On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 20:57 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 12:48:21PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > I think it needs to be done subsystem by subsystem, > > arch by arch, as maintainers accept. > Agreed - but doing one instance here, maybe another instance somewhere > else, and come the merge window having several of these patches > scattered around with no real coherent "this is what we're doing, and > its all done for this bit of the tree" kind of story is not the way to > do it. > It would be good to get core code done, or a sub-arch, and then say > "we're not accepting any patch which re-introduces the problem"... > It's a little late in the cycle for that now though. Well, if you want it done for arch/arm, just let me know when it would be convenient for you and I'll do them all as a single patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists