lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:36:32 -0400
From:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
	Jan Glauber <jang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Xen Devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been
 initialized, don't nop it out

On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 02:55:35PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
> 
> If a key has been enabled before jump_label_init() is called, don't
> nop it out.
> 
> This removes arch_jump_label_text_poke_early() (which can only nop
> out a site) and uses arch_jump_label_transform() instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/jump_label.h |    3 ++-
>  kernel/jump_label.c        |   20 ++++++++------------
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/jump_label.h b/include/linux/jump_label.h
> index 1213e9d..c8fb1b3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/jump_label.h
> +++ b/include/linux/jump_label.h
> @@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ extern void jump_label_lock(void);
>  extern void jump_label_unlock(void);
>  extern void arch_jump_label_transform(struct jump_entry *entry,
>  				 enum jump_label_type type);
> -extern void arch_jump_label_text_poke_early(jump_label_t addr);
> +extern void arch_jump_label_transform_early(struct jump_entry *entry,
> +				 enum jump_label_type type);
>  extern int jump_label_text_reserved(void *start, void *end);
>  extern void jump_label_inc(struct jump_label_key *key);
>  extern void jump_label_dec(struct jump_label_key *key);
> diff --git a/kernel/jump_label.c b/kernel/jump_label.c
> index a8ce450..059202d5 100644
> --- a/kernel/jump_label.c
> +++ b/kernel/jump_label.c
> @@ -121,13 +121,6 @@ static void __jump_label_update(struct jump_label_key *key,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * Not all archs need this.
> - */
> -void __weak arch_jump_label_text_poke_early(jump_label_t addr)
> -{
> -}
> -
>  static __init int jump_label_init(void)
>  {
>  	struct jump_entry *iter_start = __start___jump_table;
> @@ -139,12 +132,15 @@ static __init int jump_label_init(void)
>  	jump_label_sort_entries(iter_start, iter_stop);
>  
>  	for (iter = iter_start; iter < iter_stop; iter++) {
> -		arch_jump_label_text_poke_early(iter->code);
> -		if (iter->key == (jump_label_t)(unsigned long)key)
> +		struct jump_label_key *iterk;
> +
> +		iterk = (struct jump_label_key *)(unsigned long)iter->key;
> +		arch_jump_label_transform(iter, jump_label_enabled(iterk) ?
> +					  JUMP_LABEL_ENABLE : JUMP_LABEL_DISABLE);
> +		if (iterk == key)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		key = (struct jump_label_key *)(unsigned long)iter->key;
> -		atomic_set(&key->enabled, 0);
> +		key = iterk;
>  		key->entries = iter;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
>  		key->next = NULL;
> @@ -212,7 +208,7 @@ void jump_label_apply_nops(struct module *mod)
>  		return;
>  
>  	for (iter = iter_start; iter < iter_stop; iter++)
> -		arch_jump_label_text_poke_early(iter->code);
> +		arch_jump_label_transform(iter, JUMP_LABEL_DISABLE);
>  }
>  
>  static int jump_label_add_module(struct module *mod)
> -- 
> 1.7.6.2
> 

Hi,

I just realized that the early call to jump_label_inc(), isn't being
honored with this patch until later when we invoke jump_label_init().
That strikes me as being inconsistent. When jump_label_inc() returns we
should expect the branch to be updated.

Thus, I think what probably want is to add a new 'int jump_label_init'
flag. If its not set we can call 'jump_label_init()' from
jump_label_inc()/dec(). And jump_label_init() can avoid initialization
if its already set.

Thanks,

-Jason 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ