linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] vfs: add d

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:21:15 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>
Cc:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
	ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, rwheeler@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: add d_prune dentry operation

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 09:19:43AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> Let me know if the below is clearer.  The requirement is that ->d_prune be 
> called prior to unhashing (and then destroying) a victim dentry.  I'm a 
> little worried about mixing that in with the lru helpers because it is 
> only indirectly related to whether the dentry is on the LRU, and that may 
> confuse people.  A cleaned up opencoded patch is here:
> 
> 	https://github.com/NewDreamNetwork/ceph-client/commit/784a6aa6dc7baf2069c40988d79130dba17c7068
> 
> and the updated dentry_lru_prune() wrapper version is below.

Long term what I really want is a helper for doing more of the real
removal in single place.  This is one step towards it, and the series
from Dave is another.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/