[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:59:48 -0600 (MDT)
From: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
To: "Munegowda, Keshava" <keshava_mgowda@...com>
cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, balbi@...com, khilman@...com,
b-cousson@...com, gadiyar@...com, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
parthab@...ia.ti.com, tony@...mide.com, johnstul@...ibm.com,
vishwanath.bs@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5 v13] arm: omap: usb: ehci and ohci hwmod structures
for omap4
Hi
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
> Here is the highlights of the change in the design of USB Host which
> we can do after kernel 3.2 release;
>
> 1. separate the TLL changes from UHH
> 2. The TLL is be a new platform driver in ./drivers/mfd
> 3. the TLL platform driver will export apis for enable/disable clocks
> and settings.
> 3. the UHH drivers uses these APIS of TLL based on the port
> configurations from board files
> you don't need the TLL clocks to
> be on while all the ports are in phy mode.
>
> please let me know your thoughts about it.
The TLL driver shouldn't be in drivers/mfd, since it's not an MFD device.
The TLL driver should go somewhere under drivers/usb.
Basically, the existing OMAP USB subsystem MFD driver should create a TLL
device. Then the existing Linux driver probing system can associate the
TLL driver with the TLL device.
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists