linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen/blk[front|back]: Enhance discard support with secure erasing support.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:36:33 +0100
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:	"Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
	"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	"Dong Yang Li" <lidongyang@...e.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen/blk[front|back]: Enhance
	 discard support with secure erasing support.

>>> On 10.10.11 at 21:57, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 08:20:02PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 17:42 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 05:13:07PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> 
>> > > In any case it should also be posted against the canonical inter-guest
>> > > interface definition in the xen tree for review with that in mind.
>> > 
>> > Yes! But I was thinking to first let this one rattle a bit and see what
>> > folks thought about it before submitting the xen-devel.
>> 
>> It's a good idea to get ABI changes out for review before the
>> implementation rattles around so much that changing it becomes hard.
> 
> OK, lets drop this until we get that straigthen out. I've posted
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-10/msg00642.html the 
> changes to
> Xen ABI.

Yeah, but that didn't get adjusted after IanC's comments (structure
alignment, BLKIF_OP_DISCARD_FLAG_SECURE value).

Further I wonder why you don't use the "reserved" field instead of
extending the structure at the end.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/