linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging:iio:proof of concept in kernel interface.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:32:24 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	zdevai@...il.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging:iio:proof of concept in kernel interface.

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:43:03PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:

> +struct iio_dev *iio_find_dev(const char *name);
> +void iio_release_dev(struct iio_dev *indio_dev);

This looks like it should really be clk style with a struct device and a
back end interface that deals with mapping the provider to consumers at
runtime.

> +	/* read from channel 1 and exit */
> +	ret = indio_dev->info->read_raw(indio_dev, &indio_dev->channels[0], &val, &val2, 0);

I guess an actual implementation would have wrappers for doing the
indirections rather than having users peer into the ops table directly?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/