linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MIPS Kprobes: Support branch instructions probing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:07:14 +0100
From:	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To:	David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Cc:	manesoni@...co.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, ananth@...ibm.com, kamensky@...co.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS Kprobes: Support branch instructions probing

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:28:51AM -0700, David Daney wrote:

> Where is the handling for:
> 
> 	case cop1_op:
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON
> 	case lwc2_op: /* This is bbit0 on Octeon */
> 	case ldc2_op: /* This is bbit032 on Octeon */
> 	case swc2_op: /* This is bbit1 on Octeon */
> 	case sdc2_op: /* This is bbit132 on Octeon */
> #endif
> 
> These are all defined in insn_has_delayslot() but not here.

Which is a wonderful demonstration for why duplicating such a large
function from branch.c was a baaad thing to do.

Maneesh, can you refactor the code to share everything that was copied
from __compute_return_epc() can be shared with kprobes?  Idealy make
everything a two part series, first one patch to refactor branch.c and
the 2nd patch to deal with kprobes.

Thanks,

  Ralf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/