lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:56:42 +0800 From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de Subject: [RFC] [PATCH -rt 0/5] patchset focusing on cpu hotplug When tring cpu hotplug, I get some warning. And these patches are tring to fix them up. BTW, I have marked some of them as RFC: patch#3: printk: don't call printk_tick in printk_needs_cpu() I don't think we need to call printk_tick() even in mainline kernel, fix me if I'm wrong. patch#5: cpufreq: get rid of get_online_cpus()/put_online_cpus IMHO, it's about lockdep false positive, but it's a little annoying. Maybe there is other way to fix it up. And the side effect is we introduce more latency than before though it's rare path. More details in eatch patch :) Thanks, Yong --- Yong Zhang (5): hotplug: sync_unplug: No '\n' in task name hotplug: Call cpu_unplug_begin() a little early printk: don't call printk_tick in printk_needs_cpu() workqueue: hotplug fix cpufreq: get rid of get_online_cpus()/put_online_cpus drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 20 +++++++------------- kernel/cpu.c | 18 ++++++++---------- kernel/printk.c | 4 ++-- kernel/workqueue.c | 12 ++++++++---- 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists