linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging:iio:proof of concept in kernel interface.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:13:27 +0100
From:	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC:	Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	zdevai@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging:iio:proof of concept in kernel interface.

On 10/17/11 11:46, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:32:03AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> 
>> Initially I'd be tempted to only support numbered channels (on adc side).
>> Later we can add the named option - iff it has real use cases.
> 
> I think the PMIC case is a real one, assigning numbers people need to
> use to find things is doesn't really reflect actual usage.
> 
Just to make sure I'm understanding you correctly could you give an example
part.  The supplies one we explicitly handle anyway so I'm happy with that
one, I just want to confirm that this is what you are talking about.

Anyhow, should get to code this afternoon and always easier to discuss
actual code!  
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/