linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] dmaengine: add CSR SiRFprimaII DMAC driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:11:07 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, workgroup.linux@....com,
	Rongjun Ying <rongjun.ying@....com>,
	Barry Song <Barry.Song@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dmaengine: add CSR SiRFprimaII DMAC driver

On Monday 17 October 2011, Barry Song wrote:
> >> +
> >> +     /* Start the DMA transfer */
> >> +     writel_relaxed(sdesc->width, sdma->base + SIRFSOC_DMA_WIDTH_0 + cid * 4);
> >> +     writel_relaxed(cid | (schan->mode << SIRFSOC_DMA_MODE_CTRL_BIT) |
> >> +             (sdesc->dir << SIRFSOC_DMA_DIR_CTRL_BIT),
> >> +             sdma->base + cid * 0x10 + SIRFSOC_DMA_CH_CTRL);
> >> +     writel_relaxed(sdesc->xlen, sdma->base + cid * 0x10 + SIRFSOC_DMA_CH_XLEN);
> >> +     writel_relaxed(sdesc->ylen, sdma->base + cid * 0x10 + SIRFSOC_DMA_CH_YLEN);
> >> +     writel_relaxed(readl_relaxed(sdma->base + SIRFSOC_DMA_INT_EN) | (1 << cid),
> >> +             sdma->base + SIRFSOC_DMA_INT_EN);
> >> +     writel(sdesc->addr >> 2, sdma->base + cid * 0x10 + SIRFSOC_DMA_CH_ADDR);
> >> +
> >> +     if (sdesc->cyclic) {
> >> +             writel((1 << cid) | 1 << (cid + 16) |
> >> +                     readl_relaxed(sdma->base + SIRFSOC_DMA_CH_LOOP_CTRL),
> >> +                     sdma->base + SIRFSOC_DMA_CH_LOOP_CTRL);
> >> +             schan->happened_cyclic = schan->completed_cyclic = 0;
> >> +     }
> > any reason why we have mixed use of writel_relaxes and writel?
> > Shouldn't all the DMA register writes be done only using writel?
> 
> Arnd comment this in v2.

The new version looks good to me, but a comment in the source code would
be very helpful, especially to prevent people from attempting to "fix" it
in the future.

I'm not sure about the writel/readl_relaxed in the end of that function,
because I don't understand what having a "cyclic" descriptor means.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/