linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] AT91: dt: at91sam9g45 family and board device tree files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:07:17 +0200
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] AT91: dt: at91sam9g45 family and board device tree
 files

On 10/07/2011 02:56 PM, Nicolas Ferre :
> On 10/05/2011 03:00 PM, Rob Herring :
>> Nicolas,
>>
>> On 10/03/2011 05:00 AM, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>>> Create a new device tree source file for Atmel at91sam9g45 SoC family.
>>> The Evaluation Kit at91sam9m10g45ek includes it.
>>> This first basic support will be populated as drivers and boards will be
>>> converted to device tree.
>>> Contains serial, dma and interrupt controllers.
>>>
>>> The generic board file still takes advantage of platform data for early serial
>>> init. As we need a storage media and the NAND flash driver is not converted to
>>> DT yet, we keep old initialization for it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>

[..]

>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..7bcb9a9
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + *  Setup code for AT91SAM Evaluation Kits with Device Tree support
>>> + *
>>> + *  Covers: * AT91SAM9G45-EKES  board
>>> + *          * AT91SAM9M10-EKES  board
>>> + *          * AT91SAM9M10G45-EK board
>>> + *
>>> + *  Copyright (C) 2011 Atmel,
>>> + *                2011 Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
>>> + *
>>> + * Licensed under GPLv2 or later.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>>> +
>>> +#include <mach/hardware.h>
>>> +#include <mach/board.h>
>>> +#include <mach/gpio.h>
>>> +#include <mach/system_rev.h>
>>> +#include <mach/at91sam9_smc.h>
>>> +
>>> +#include <asm/setup.h>
>>> +#include <asm/irq.h>
>>> +#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
>>> +#include <asm/mach/map.h>
>>> +#include <asm/mach/irq.h>
>>> +
>>> +#include "sam9_smc.h"
>>> +#include "generic.h"

As found by Jean-Christophe, it seems that some clock lookup data are missing here. Something like:

+/*
+ * Lookup table for attaching a specific name and platform_data pointer to
+ * devices as they get created by of_platform_populate(). Ideally this table
+ * would not exist, but the current clock implementation depends on some devices
+ * having a specific name.
+ /
+static const struct of_dev_auxdata at91_auxdata_lookup[] __initconst = {
+ / at91sam9260/ at91sam9g20 /
+ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("atmel,at91sam9260-usart", 0xfffff200, "atmel_usart.0", NULL),
+ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("atmel,at91sam9260-usart", 0xfffb0000, "atmel_usart.1", NULL),
+ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("atmel,at91sam9260-usart", 0xfffb4000, "atmel_usart.2", NULL),
+ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("atmel,at91sam9260-usart", 0xfffb8000, "atmel_usart.3", NULL),
+ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("atmel,at91sam9260-usart", 0xfffd0000, "atmel_usart.4", NULL),
+ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("atmel,at91sam9260-usart", 0xfffd4000, "atmel_usart.5", NULL),
+ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("atmel,at91sam9260-usart", 0xfffd8000, "atmel_usart.6", NULL),
+ / at91sam9g45*/
+ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("atmel,at91sam9260-usart", 0xffffee00, "atmel_usart.0", NULL),
+ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("atmel,at91sam9260-usart", 0xfff8c000, "atmel_usart.1", NULL),
+ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("atmel,at91sam9260-usart", 0xfff90000, "atmel_usart.2", NULL),
+ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("atmel,at91sam9260-usart", 0xfff94000, "atmel_usart.3", NULL),
+ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("atmel,at91sam9260-usart", 0xfff98000, "atmel_usart.4", NULL),
+ { /* sentinel */ }
+};

With a change here:
  of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, at91_auxdata_lookup, NULL);

I know that it is a temporary usage of auxdata. Does it sound the right thing to do for the moment?

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/