linux-kernel - [PATCH 13/24] GFS2: Remove obsolete assert

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:48:27 +0100
From:	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
To:	cluster-devel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 13/24] GFS2: Remove obsolete assert

Given that a resource group has been locked, there is no reason why
we should not be able to allocate as many blocks as are free. The
al_requested parameter should really be considered as a minimum
number of blocks to be available. Should this limit be overshot,
there are other mechanisms which will prevent over allocation.

Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>

diff --git a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
index 5bfb970..08b3a80 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
@@ -1077,15 +1077,8 @@ int gfs2_inplace_reserve_i(struct gfs2_inode *ip,
 
 void gfs2_inplace_release(struct gfs2_inode *ip)
 {
-	struct gfs2_sbd *sdp = GFS2_SB(&ip->i_inode);
 	struct gfs2_alloc *al = ip->i_alloc;
 
-	if (gfs2_assert_warn(sdp, al->al_alloced <= al->al_requested) == -1)
-		fs_warn(sdp, "al_alloced = %u, al_requested = %u "
-			     "al_file = %s, al_line = %u\n",
-		             al->al_alloced, al->al_requested, al->al_file,
-			     al->al_line);
-
 	if (al->al_rgd_gh.gh_gl)
 		gfs2_glock_dq_uninit(&al->al_rgd_gh);
 }
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/