linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] 9p changes fro merge window

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:25:29 +0200
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>
Cc:	V9FS Developers <v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] 9p changes fro merge window

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com> wrote:
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>  git://github.com/ericvh/linux.git for-next

So for the merge window, I *really* want the development trees I pull
from explicitly verified some way.

Now, the p9 patches seem to be small enough, and not core enough, for
me to care deeply, but I really *really* want to not see unsigned
github things.

Putting a signed tag on there somewhere that actually signs the top
commit *and* mentions the repository and branch it is on (ie github)
kis not wonderfully convenient, but it's at least relatively
straightforward (do I have a gpg key I can trust?).

Or using a host that I can trust is being maintained by you guys (or
some trusted third party like kernel.org).

(Also, I'm only seeing about half the patches mentioned in linux-next. Hmm?)

Please? Not pulled.

                   Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/