lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:08:34 -0400
From:	Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Debian kernel maintainers <debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not
 built in-tree

On 2011-10-25 22:54 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:17:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:04:55PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >  > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:51:42PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
> >  > > This is not the case: lockdep works fine with staging modules.
> >  > 
> >  > Yes, that was fixed a few kernel versions ago.
> >  > 
> >  > Now you might want to update that fix for the TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag as
> >  > well, if you feel it is needed.
> > 
> > I'm assuming you mean this patch ?
> > 
> > commit 7816c45bf13255157c00fb8aca86cb64d825e878
> > Author: Roland Vossen <rvossen@...adcom.com>
> > Date:   Thu Apr 7 11:20:58 2011 +0200
> > 
> >     modules: Enabled dynamic debugging for staging modules
> 
> Hm, this is the patch I was thinking about yes.  But as you point out:
[...]
> Perhaps the lockdep thing is totally different.  I don't know about that
> check.

Lockdep is disabled (for the whole system) by add_taint itself.  The
relevant commit that fixes TAINT_CRAP appears to be this one (circa
2.6.30):

  commit 574bbe782057fdf0490dc7dec906a2dc26363e20
  Author: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
  Date:   Sat Apr 11 03:17:18 2009 +0200
  
      lockdep: continue lock debugging despite some taints

I didn't know about the dynamic debug problem.  Is there more breakage
that we haven't found yet?  Remind me why we're trying to cripple out
of tree module users?

Cheers,
-- 
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ