linux-kernel - Re: [stable] 2.6.32.21 - uptime related crashes?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:21:53 +0200
From:	Ruben Kerkhof <ruben@...enkerkhof.com>
To:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	MINOURA Makoto <minoura@...inux.co.jp>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, stable@...nel.org,
	Hervé Commowick <hcommowick@...sec.fr>,
	Rand@...per.es, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@...ian.org>
Subject: Re: [stable] 2.6.32.21 - uptime related crashes?

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 00:44, john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 20:31 +0200, Ruben Kerkhof wrote:

>> I just had two crashes on two different machines, both with an uptime
>> of 208 days.
>> Both were 5520's running 2.6.34.8, but with a CONFIG_HZ of 1000
>>
>> 2011-10-23T16:49:18.618029+02:00 phy001 kernel: BUG: soft lockup -
>> CPU#0 stuck for 17163091968s! [qemu-kvm:16949]
>
> So were these actual crashes, or just softlockup false positives?

Just softlockups, I haven't seen the divide_by_zero crash.

Thanks,

Ruben
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/