linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/13] vfs: count unlinked inodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 28 Oct 2011 04:04:45 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jack@...e.cz, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	toshi.okajima@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] vfs: count unlinked inodes

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:53:53AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 02:08 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > This one gets me a repeated spew of WARN_ONs during XFS log recover,
> > repeating the following pattern:
> 
> The assumption here is that set_nlink() is called with a non-zero count.
> The point of introducing set_nlink() was to verify this assumption,
> otherwise pending delete accounting will be screwed up.
> 
> If setting i_nlink to zero is not a bug in xfs we can do two things:
> 
>  1) do a conditional clear_nlink() in xfs_setup_inode() to document that
> nlink can indeed be zero
> 
>  2) remove the warning from set_nlink().  That may hide some cases where
> i_nlink was cleared without the intention of the filesystem but it will
> work just fine wrt. the pending delete accounting. 

I suspect 2 might be the better option.  The pattern we see here in
XFS is pretty typical for transactional filesytems - when we mount a
filesystem after an unclean shutdown we need to drop all inodes that
were open but unlinked when the system crashed, and that typically
means reading inodes from disk that have a zero i_nlink.  Maybe some
filesystems never instanciate a VFS inode for it, but I suspect many
do.

For XFS we will actually see it during regularly testing as we have
an ioctl that simulates a shutdown and can thus trigger log recovery
easily, while for others like ext4 you'd actually have to do a real
reset of your (physical or virtual) machine.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/