| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 00:16:40 +0600 From: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com> To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: Fix unused variable warning. On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 23:12 +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Trond Myklebust >> <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 16:36 +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote: >> + data->inode->nfs_client->cl_hostname, > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > NFS_SERVER(data->inode)->nfs_client.... Opss. Sorry, should've more careful, rather doing it quickly :(. data->inode has nothing inside named nfs_client, but didn't even complain. I'll resend it. Anyway, I found the two following warning in nfs/file.c fs/nfs/file.c: In function ‘nfs_file_release’: fs/nfs/file.c:140:17: warning: unused variable ‘dentry’ fs/nfs/file.c: In function ‘nfs_file_read’: fs/nfs/file.c:237:9: warning: unused variable ‘count’ I'm wanting to send one patch to cleanup all these unused variable issues. Shall I? Or, should I send separate patches? Thanks, Rakib -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists