linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] ata port runtime power management support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 03 Nov 2011 22:47:17 +0800
From:	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ata port runtime power management support

On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 22:30 +0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com> wrote:
> >> * How much does this add on top of hardware timed auto spindown and
> >>   dynamic link power management?
> >
> > Sorry, I don't understand this question.
> > What do you mean?
> 
> I was curious about the amount of additional power saving on top of
> the existing PM features.

I'll measure the power saving.

> 
> >> * Do the added benefits justify yet another runtime powersaving
> >>   mechanism?
> >
> > There will be ACPI firmware which supports ata port runtime D3Cold.
> > To enable ata port runtime PM is the first step.
> 
> libata can already turn off unused ports although it wouldn't go as
> far as putting the whole controller into D3.

At runtime?
Could you point me which piece of code implement this?

> 
> >> * Any way we can tie the other stuff with overall runtime PM?
> >
> > What's the other stuff?
> > Do you mean tie disk/link/port/controller stuff with overall runtime PM?
> 
> Hardware initiated spin-down (hdparm -S) and link power saving (look
> for ata_lpm_*). It would be great if there's an overall design how
> they interact before adding yet another PM vector.

Yes. Need to think about it.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/