linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] new cgroup controller "fork"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Nov 2011 20:20:39 +0100
From:	Max Kellermann <max@...mpel.org>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new cgroup controller "fork"

On 2011/11/03 20:03, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> Sure - I'm just not seeing that a whole separate cgroup for it is
> appropriate or a good plan. Anyone doing real resource management needs
> the rest of the stuff anyway.

Right.  When I saw Frederic's controller today, my first thought was
that one could move the fork limit code over into that controller.  If
we reach a consensus that this would be a good idea, and would have
chances to get merged, I could probably take some time to refactor my
code.

Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/