linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH 1/3] Introducing grant table V2 stucture

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Nov 2011 16:22:04 +0000
From:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To:	annie li <annie.li@...cle.com>
CC:	Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>,
	"kurt.hackel@...cle.com" <kurt.hackel@...cle.com>,
	"jeremy@...p.org" <jeremy@...p.org>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH 1/3] Introducing grant table V2 stucture

On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 16:00 +0000, annie li wrote:
> Maybe addr or gnttab_addr?

IMHO the gnttab_ bit belongs in either (or both) the struct name or the
variable names referencing the struct, rather than the fields
themselves. It should be obvious from the context that this member is
something to do with gnttab. e.g. I think gnttab_shared->addr would be
fine, as would shared->addr in the context of gnttab.c etc.

Ian.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/