| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 13:34:32 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [225/264] block: make gendisk hold a reference to its queue
3.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
commit f992ae801a7dec34a4ed99a6598bbbbfb82af4fb upstream.
The following command sequence triggers an oops.
# mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt
# echo 1 > /sys/class/scsi_device/0\:0\:1\:0/device/delete
# umount /mnt
general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
CPU 2
Modules linked in:
Pid: 791, comm: umount Not tainted 3.1.0-rc3-work+ #8 Bochs Bochs
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810d0879>] [<ffffffff810d0879>] __lock_acquire+0x389/0x1d60
...
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff810d2845>] lock_acquire+0x95/0x140
[<ffffffff81aed87b>] _raw_spin_lock+0x3b/0x50
[<ffffffff811573bc>] bdi_lock_two+0x5c/0x70
[<ffffffff811c2f6c>] bdev_inode_switch_bdi+0x4c/0xf0
[<ffffffff811c3fcb>] __blkdev_put+0x11b/0x1d0
[<ffffffff811c4010>] __blkdev_put+0x160/0x1d0
[<ffffffff811c40df>] blkdev_put+0x5f/0x190
[<ffffffff8118f18d>] kill_block_super+0x4d/0x80
[<ffffffff8118f4a5>] deactivate_locked_super+0x45/0x70
[<ffffffff8119003a>] deactivate_super+0x4a/0x70
[<ffffffff811ac4ad>] mntput_no_expire+0xed/0x130
[<ffffffff811acf2e>] sys_umount+0x7e/0x3a0
[<ffffffff81aeeeab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
This is because bdev holds on to disk but disk doesn't pin the
associated queue. If a SCSI device is removed while the device is
still open, the sdev puts the base reference to the queue on release.
When the bdev is finally released, the associated queue is already
gone along with the bdi and bdev_inode_switch_bdi() ends up
dereferencing already freed bdi.
Even if it were not for this bug, disk not holding onto the associated
queue is very unusual and error-prone.
Fix it by making add_disk() take an extra reference to its queue and
put it on disk_release() and ensuring that disk and its fops owner are
put in that order after all accesses to the disk and queue are
complete.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
block/genhd.c | 8 ++++++++
fs/block_dev.c | 13 ++++++++-----
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/block/genhd.c
+++ b/block/genhd.c
@@ -611,6 +611,12 @@ void add_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
register_disk(disk);
blk_register_queue(disk);
+ /*
+ * Take an extra ref on queue which will be put on disk_release()
+ * so that it sticks around as long as @disk is there.
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(blk_get_queue(disk->queue));
+
retval = sysfs_create_link(&disk_to_dev(disk)->kobj, &bdi->dev->kobj,
"bdi");
WARN_ON(retval);
@@ -1095,6 +1101,8 @@ static void disk_release(struct device *
disk_replace_part_tbl(disk, NULL);
free_part_stats(&disk->part0);
free_part_info(&disk->part0);
+ if (disk->queue)
+ blk_put_queue(disk->queue);
kfree(disk);
}
struct class block_class = {
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -1085,6 +1085,7 @@ static int __blkdev_put(struct block_dev
static int __blkdev_get(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, int for_part)
{
struct gendisk *disk;
+ struct module *owner;
int ret;
int partno;
int perm = 0;
@@ -1110,6 +1111,7 @@ static int __blkdev_get(struct block_dev
disk = get_gendisk(bdev->bd_dev, &partno);
if (!disk)
goto out;
+ owner = disk->fops->owner;
disk_block_events(disk);
mutex_lock_nested(&bdev->bd_mutex, for_part);
@@ -1137,8 +1139,8 @@ static int __blkdev_get(struct block_dev
bdev->bd_disk = NULL;
mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
disk_unblock_events(disk);
- module_put(disk->fops->owner);
put_disk(disk);
+ module_put(owner);
goto restart;
}
}
@@ -1194,8 +1196,8 @@ static int __blkdev_get(struct block_dev
goto out_unlock_bdev;
}
/* only one opener holds refs to the module and disk */
- module_put(disk->fops->owner);
put_disk(disk);
+ module_put(owner);
}
bdev->bd_openers++;
if (for_part)
@@ -1215,8 +1217,8 @@ static int __blkdev_get(struct block_dev
out_unlock_bdev:
mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
disk_unblock_events(disk);
- module_put(disk->fops->owner);
put_disk(disk);
+ module_put(owner);
out:
bdput(bdev);
@@ -1442,14 +1444,15 @@ static int __blkdev_put(struct block_dev
if (!bdev->bd_openers) {
struct module *owner = disk->fops->owner;
- put_disk(disk);
- module_put(owner);
disk_put_part(bdev->bd_part);
bdev->bd_part = NULL;
bdev->bd_disk = NULL;
if (bdev != bdev->bd_contains)
victim = bdev->bd_contains;
bdev->bd_contains = NULL;
+
+ put_disk(disk);
+ module_put(owner);
}
mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
bdput(bdev);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists