linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH 1/3] Introducing grant table V2 stucture

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:50:43 +0800
From:	ANNIE LI <annie.li@...cle.com>
To:	Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>
CC:	"kurt.hackel@...cle.com" <kurt.hackel@...cle.com>,
	"jeremy@...p.org" <jeremy@...p.org>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH 1/3] Introducing grant table V2 stucture



On 2011-11-10 0:14, Paul Durrant wrote:
> Annie,
>
> On 2011-11-9 19:11, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> I see. v2 function includes mapping and arch_gnttab_map_shared, v1 function only include arch_gnttab_map_sh, right?
>> This will lead to some code duplicated in two functions.
> My preference would be to have duplicated calls to arch_gnttab_map_shared(). I think it's more illustrative of the difference between v1 and v2 having separate status pages.
Ok, will do as you suggested, thanks.

Thanks
Annie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/