linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 04/17] powerpc: Allow multiple machine-check handlers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:37:36 -0600
From:	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Kyle Moffett <Kyle.D.Moffett@...ing.com>
Cc:	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
	Timur Tabi <B04825@...escale.com>,
	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/17] powerpc: Allow multiple machine-check handlers


On Nov 9, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:

> Certain processor types are co-supportable, and their machine-check
> handlers will be referenced if the entries in cputable.c are actually
> generated, so allow more than one machine-check handler to be built in.
> 
> This fixes a bug where configuring FreeScale E5500 support (P5020DS)
> into the kernel would break machine-check handling on PPC64 A2 systems
> by using a bogus machine_check_generic() handler that does nothing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Moffett <Kyle.D.Moffett@...ing.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c |   18 ++++++++----------
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> index 4e59082..e3113341 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -418,7 +418,8 @@ int machine_check_47x(struct pt_regs *regs)
> 
> 	return 0;
> }
> -#elif defined(CONFIG_E500)
> +#endif
> +#if defined(CONFIG_FSL_E500MC) || defined(CONFIG_FSL_E5500)
> int machine_check_e500mc(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> 	unsigned long mcsr = mfspr(SPRN_MCSR);
> @@ -517,7 +518,8 @@ silent_out:
> 	mtspr(SPRN_MCSR, mcsr);
> 	return mfspr(SPRN_MCSR) == 0 && recoverable;
> }
> -
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_E500_V1_V2

doesn't exist yet, so patch is wrong sequence order.

> int machine_check_e500(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> 	unsigned long reason = get_mc_reason(regs);
> @@ -557,12 +559,8 @@ int machine_check_e500(struct pt_regs *regs)
> 
> 	return 0;
> }
> -
> -int machine_check_generic(struct pt_regs *regs)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -#elif defined(CONFIG_E200)
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_E200
> int machine_check_e200(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> 	unsigned long reason = get_mc_reason(regs);
> @@ -587,7 +585,8 @@ int machine_check_e200(struct pt_regs *regs)
> 
> 	return 0;
> }
> -#else
> +#endif
> +
> int machine_check_generic(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> 	unsigned long reason = get_mc_reason(regs);
> @@ -623,7 +622,6 @@ int machine_check_generic(struct pt_regs *regs)
> 	}
> 	return 0;
> }
> -#endif /* everything else */
> 
> void machine_check_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> -- 
> 1.7.2.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/