lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:29:53 +0000
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: more intensive memory corruption debug

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 01:36:32PM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> With CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC configured, cpu will generate exception on
> access (read,write) to not allocated page, what allow to catch code
> which corrupt memory. However kernel is trying to maximalise memory
> usage, hence there is usually not much free pages in the system and
> buggy code usually corrupt some crucial data.
> 
> This patch change buddy allocator to keep more free/protected pages
> and interlace free/protected and allocated pages to increase probability
> of catch a corruption.
> 
> When kernel is compiled with CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC, corrupt_dbg
> parameter is available to specify page order that should be kept free.
> 
> I.e:
> 
> * corrupt_dbg=1:
>   - order=0 allocation will result of 1 page allocated and 1 consecutive
>     page protected

It is common to call this a guard page so I would suggest using a
similar name. The meaning of "guard page" will be obvious without
looking at the documentation.

>   - order > 0 allocations are not affected
> * corrupt_dbg=2
>   - order=0 allocation will result 1 allocated page and 3 consecutive
>     pages protected
>   - order=1 allocation will result 2 allocated pages and 2 consecutive
>     pages protected
>   - order > 1 allocations are not affected

That's a bit confusing to read and the name corrupt_dbg does not
give any hints. It would be easier to understand if it was called
debug_guardpage_minorder=n where where 1<<n is the minimum allocation
size used by the page allocator.

"When kernel is compiled with CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC,
debug_guardpage_minorder defines the minimum order used by the page
allocator to grant a request. The requested size will be returned with
the remaining pages used as guard pages."

or similar.

> * and so on
> 
> Probably only practical usage is corrupt_dbg=1, as long someone is not
> really desperate by memory corruption bug and have huge amount of RAM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |    9 ++++
>  include/linux/mm.h                  |   11 +++++
>  include/linux/page-debug-flags.h    |    4 +-
>  mm/Kconfig.debug                    |    1 +
>  mm/page_alloc.c                     |   74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  5 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> index a0c5c5f..cbfa533 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -567,6 +567,15 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted.
>  			/proc/<pid>/coredump_filter.
>  			See also Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt.
>  
> +	corrupt_dbg=	[KNL] When CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is set, this
> +			parameter allows control order of pages that will be
> +			intentionally kept free (and hence protected) by buddy
> +			allocator. Bigger value increase probability of
> +			catching random memory corruption, but reduce amount
> +			of memory for normal system use. Setting this
> +			parameter to 1 or 2, should be enough to identify most
> +			random memory corruption problems.
> +

This was clearer than the commit log entry at least although I still
think the parameter name is poor.

>  	cpuidle.off=1	[CPU_IDLE]
>  			disable the cpuidle sub-system
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 0a22db1..4de55df 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1617,5 +1617,16 @@ extern void copy_user_huge_page(struct page *dst, struct page *src,
>  				unsigned int pages_per_huge_page);
>  #endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE || CONFIG_HUGETLBFS */
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> +extern unsigned int _corrupt_dbg;
> +
> +static inline unsigned int corrupt_dbg(void)
> +{
> +	return _corrupt_dbg;
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline unsigned int corrupt_dbg(void) { return 0; }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC */
> +
>  #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>  #endif /* _LINUX_MM_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/page-debug-flags.h b/include/linux/page-debug-flags.h
> index b0638fd..f63c905 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page-debug-flags.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page-debug-flags.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>  
>  enum page_debug_flags {
>  	PAGE_DEBUG_FLAG_POISON,		/* Page is poisoned */
> +	PAGE_DEBUG_FLAG_CORRUPT,

See, the corrupt name here is misleading. It's not corrupt, it's a
guard page. Until something writes to it, it's not corrupt.

>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -21,7 +22,8 @@ enum page_debug_flags {
>   */
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_WANT_PAGE_DEBUG_FLAGS
> -#if !defined(CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING) \
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING) && \
> +    !defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC) \
>  /* && !defined(CONFIG_PAGE_DEBUG_SOMETHING_ELSE) && ... */
>  #error WANT_PAGE_DEBUG_FLAGS is turned on with no debug features!
>  #endif
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig.debug b/mm/Kconfig.debug
> index 8b1a477..3c554f0 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ config DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
>  	depends on !HIBERNATION || ARCH_SUPPORTS_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC && !PPC && !SPARC
>  	depends on !KMEMCHECK
>  	select PAGE_POISONING if !ARCH_SUPPORTS_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> +	select WANT_PAGE_DEBUG_FLAGS

Why not add PAGE_CORRUPT (or preferably PAGE_GUARD) in the same pattern
as PAGE_POISONING already uses?

>  	---help---
>  	  Unmap pages from the kernel linear mapping after free_pages().
>  	  This results in a large slowdown, but helps to find certain types
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 9dd443d..de25c82 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
>  #include <linux/ftrace_event.h>
>  #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
>  #include <linux/prefetch.h>
> +#include <linux/page-debug-flags.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>  #include <asm/div64.h>
> @@ -403,6 +404,44 @@ static inline void prep_zero_page(struct page *page, int order, gfp_t gfp_flags)
>  		clear_highpage(page + i);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> +unsigned int _corrupt_dbg;
> +
> +static int __init corrupt_dbg_setup(char *buf)
> +{
> +	unsigned long res;
> +
> +	if (kstrtoul(buf, 10, &res) < 0 ||  res > MAX_ORDER / 2) {
> +		printk(KERN_ERR "Bad corrupt_dbg value\n");
> +		return 0;
> +	}

You don't document the limitations of the value for corrupt_dbg.

> +	_corrupt_dbg = res;
> +	printk(KERN_INFO "Setting corrupt debug order to %d\n", _corrupt_dbg);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +__setup("corrupt_dbg=", corrupt_dbg_setup);
> +
> +static inline void set_page_corrupt_dbg(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	__set_bit(PAGE_DEBUG_FLAG_CORRUPT, &page->debug_flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void clear_page_corrupt_dbg(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	__clear_bit(PAGE_DEBUG_FLAG_CORRUPT, &page->debug_flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool page_is_corrupt_dbg(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	return test_bit(PAGE_DEBUG_FLAG_CORRUPT, &page->debug_flags);
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +static inline void set_page_corrupt_dbg(struct page *page) { }
> +static inline void clear_page_corrupt_dbg(struct page *page) { }
> +static inline bool page_is_corrupt_dbg(struct page *page) { return false; }
> +#endif
> +
>  static inline void set_page_order(struct page *page, int order)
>  {
>  	set_page_private(page, order);
> @@ -460,6 +499,11 @@ static inline int page_is_buddy(struct page *page, struct page *buddy,
>  	if (page_zone_id(page) != page_zone_id(buddy))
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	if (page_is_corrupt_dbg(buddy) && page_order(buddy) == order) {
> +		VM_BUG_ON(page_count(buddy) != 0);
> +		return 1;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (PageBuddy(buddy) && page_order(buddy) == order) {
>  		VM_BUG_ON(page_count(buddy) != 0);
>  		return 1;
> @@ -518,9 +562,15 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page,
>  			break;
>  
>  		/* Our buddy is free, merge with it and move up one order. */
> -		list_del(&buddy->lru);
> -		zone->free_area[order].nr_free--;
> -		rmv_page_order(buddy);
> +		if (page_is_corrupt_dbg(buddy)) {
> +			clear_page_corrupt_dbg(buddy);
> +			set_page_private(page, 0);
> +			__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, 1 << order);

Why are the buddies not merged?

> +		} else {
> +			list_del(&buddy->lru);
> +			zone->free_area[order].nr_free--;
> +			rmv_page_order(buddy);
> +		}
>  		combined_idx = buddy_idx & page_idx;
>  		page = page + (combined_idx - page_idx);
>  		page_idx = combined_idx;
> @@ -736,7 +786,7 @@ void __meminit __free_pages_bootmem(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
>   * -- wli
>   */
>  static inline void expand(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
> -	int low, int high, struct free_area *area,
> +	unsigned int low, unsigned int high, struct free_area *area,
>  	int migratetype)
>  {
>  	unsigned long size = 1 << high;
> @@ -746,9 +796,16 @@ static inline void expand(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
>  		high--;
>  		size >>= 1;
>  		VM_BUG_ON(bad_range(zone, &page[size]));
> -		list_add(&page[size].lru, &area->free_list[migratetype]);
> -		area->nr_free++;
> -		set_page_order(&page[size], high);
> +		if (high < corrupt_dbg()) {
> +			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page[size].lru);
> +			set_page_corrupt_dbg(&page[size]);
> +			set_page_private(&page[size], high);
> +			__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, -(1 << high));
> +		} else {

Because high is a signed integer, I don't think this would necessarily
optimised away at compile time when DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is not set adding a
new branch to a heavily executed fast path.

For the fast paths, you should not add new branches if you can. Move the
debugging code to inline functions that only exist when DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
is set so there is no additional overhead in the !CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
case.

> +			set_page_order(&page[size], high);
> +			list_add(&page[size].lru, &area->free_list[migratetype]);
> +			area->nr_free++;
> +		}
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -1756,7 +1813,8 @@ void warn_alloc_failed(gfp_t gfp_mask, int order, const char *fmt, ...)
>  {
>  	unsigned int filter = SHOW_MEM_FILTER_NODES;
>  
> -	if ((gfp_mask & __GFP_NOWARN) || !__ratelimit(&nopage_rs))
> +	if ((gfp_mask & __GFP_NOWARN) || !__ratelimit(&nopage_rs) ||
> +	    corrupt_dbg() > 0)
>  		return;
>  
>  	/*
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ