[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:29:35 +0100
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"ming.m.lin@...el.com" <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_events: fix and improve x86 event scheduling
On 10.11.11 19:52:47, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> IIRC, Robert's proposal limits the rewind stack to 1, which, if my mind
> didn't completely stop working, should end up being something like
> O(n^3). Now I don't know if Robert's thing is perfect for AMD F15 or if
> there's still some odd fail cases, but since he's from AMD I suspect its
> good enough in practice.
Yes, patches are ok for AMD F15.
> In fact, I almost merged his code, my only complaint was a lack of
> comments and having had to spend several hours to fully understand the
> thing a few months ago, I felt it really could use some since I didn't
> want to have to spend that amount of effort every time I'd have to look
> at the thing.
Will repost an updated version.
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists