lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:18:16 +0100
From:	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To:	Mike Dunn <mikedunn@...sguy.com>
Cc:	dwmw2@...radead.org, dedekind1@...il.com,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/16] mtd/docg3: add OOB layout to mtdinfo

Mike Dunn <mikedunn@...sguy.com> writes:

> On 11/10/2011 12:05 AM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> +static struct nand_ecclayout docg3_oobinfo = {
>> +	.eccbytes = 8,
>> +	.eccpos = {7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14},
>> +	.oobfree = {{0, 7}, {15, 1} },
>> +	.oobavail = 8,
>> +};
>> +

I took a different approach.  I check an internal docg3 register to see if the
page was written. Or I could had have checked the Hamming code, as I don't think
it can be 0xff whatever the pagesize 7 bytes values.

The reason behind is that the Hamming code is Ham(64, 57), ie. Ham(2^6,
2^6-6-1). The means the 6 bits are enough to cover all codewords possibilities,
and 0xff is not one of them.

So unless a bitflip in Hamming code, 0xff in it means blank page. And I think
the ECC engine is even smarter, with the ECCCONF1_PAGE_IS_WRITTEN.

>
> Just FYI, per Ivan's suggestion, I changed this to use the last oob byte as a
> "page programmed" flag for the purpose of detecting bit flips when reading a
> blank page.  Maybe something to keep in mind.  You can have a look at the latest
> G4 driver patch to see exactly how I use it.
I personally think this should be provided by the MTD API. A function
is_page_blank(ofs) could tell if the page was written or not. Now if the
function is NULL, the upper layer (UBIFS, ...) could decide _by itself_ to
assign a free OOB byte to that meaning. But IMHO it's not the drivers duty to
take these decisions to restrict the OOB, let it be done at an upper level.

Cheers.

-- 
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ