| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:55:24 +0100 (CET) From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] usb: gadget: drop "select USB_GADGET_S3C_HSOTG_PIO" On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Paul Bolle wrote: > 0) All is OK: I've sent you eleven patches in this series. Two were > taken by maintainers (drm and unicore32). Nine are now in trivial > for-next. Two needed approval (powerpc/4xx and unicore32). powerpc/4xx > got acked, and that ack is in your commit and unicore32 got taken by a > maintainer. Thanks for cross-checking. > 1) For future series of this kind (if any): does my approach work for > you? See, I basically have a list of potential problems that I work on > in batches, but one by one. So I'll work on a handful of items on that > list, drop the false positives, send a few to maintainers and send the > rest to you. After that I quickly go do something else, as this is not > the kind of stuff I like to do for hours on end. > > 2) This means in such a series you'll get batches, a few days apart, of > patches each whatever-it-takes apart. Is that more work on your side? I don't really care ... as you can imagine, trivial queue is quite low on my priority list, so I am processing it in batches as well on a rather random basis. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists