linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] leds: leds-lp3944, fix "sparse" warning "mixing different enum types"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:00:07 +0100
From:	Antonio Ospite <ospite@...denti.unina.it>
To:	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>
Cc:	Antonio Ospite <ospite@...denti.unina.it>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: leds-lp3944, fix "sparse" warning
 "mixing different enum types"

On Thu,  6 Oct 2011 23:34:44 +0200
Antonio Ospite <ospite@...denti.unina.it> wrote:

> Fix a warning from "sparse":
> 
> drivers/leds/leds-lp3944.c:292:23: warning: mixing different enum types
> drivers/leds/leds-lp3944.c:292:23:     int enum led_brightness  versus
> drivers/leds/leds-lp3944.c:292:23:     int enum lp3944_status
> 
> Keeping track of LP3944_LED_STATUS_OFF and LP3944_LED_STATUS_ON only in
> lp3944_led_set_brightness() is OK, as the handling of DIM (blinking)
> mode[s] is in lp3944_led_set_blink().
> 
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ospite@...denti.unina.it>

Ping.
Dan, did you receive this one? I can't see it in 3.2-rc2.

Regards,
   Antonio.

> ---
>  drivers/leds/leds-lp3944.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lp3944.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lp3944.c
> index 9010c05..3cc01fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lp3944.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp3944.c
> @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ static void lp3944_led_set_brightness(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
>  	dev_dbg(&led->client->dev, "%s: %s, %d\n",
>  		__func__, led_cdev->name, brightness);
>  
> -	led->status = brightness;
> +	led->status = !!brightness;
>  	schedule_work(&led->work);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.6.3
> 
> 


-- 
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it

PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
   See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped