linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] debugfs: a tool to print 32-bit registers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:36:43 +0200
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	anaghi@...l.gnudd.com, balbi@...com,
	broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] debugfs: a tool to print 32-bit registers

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 01:20:49AM +0100, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> This is V2 of what I posted a few days ago. I also updates
> the file in Documentation.  I Cc:d people who gave feedback.
> 
> Patch 2 uses the new tool for an existing file I didn't initially
> notice (I had a victim file, but it's seriously failing compilation).
> Code removal there is almost zero because Felipe Balbi already did
> stuff in the way I do.
> 
> Mark Brown suggested to look at drivers/base/regmap, and actually this
> may be duplicating what is already being worked on in a more general
> way. My code base is earlier than regmap so I didn't notice.
> Unfortunately I have no resources left to study regmap as it
> deserves.
> 
> Mark, if you say this is not useful at this point, I'm fine with it; I
> may return with some regbase-aware code when time permits if it's not
> already there.

-ENOPATCH ?? I didn't receive any replies to this mail with the patch.
Is my mailer screwed up ?

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)