linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add "-e" option to rpc.gssd to allow error on ticket expiry. Try 2 with added man pages.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:47:28 -0500
From:	Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>
To:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Cc:	John Hughes <john@...vaedi.com>, John Hughes <john@...va.com>,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add "-e" option to rpc.gssd to allow error on ticket
 expiry. Try 2 with added man pages.

On 2011-11-18 22:33 +0200, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 20:19 +0100, John Hughes wrote: 
> > On 11/18/2011 07:35 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 15:34 +0100, John Hughes wrote:
> > >    
> > >> Description: Add "-e" (ticket expiry is error) option to rpc.gssd
> > >>    In kernels starting around 2.6.34 the nfs4 server will block all I/O
> > >>    when a user ticket expires.  In earlier kernels the I/O would fail
> > >>    with an EACCESS error.  This patch adds a "-e" option to rpc.gssd
> > >>    which allow the earlier behaviour (EKEYEXPIRED is converted to
> > >>    EACCESS).  This behaviour is particularly useful when user home
> > >>    directories are nfs4 mounted with krb5 security - if the user is
> > >>    absent from their workstation for long enough for the ticket to
> > >>    expire a new ticket will be obtained (via pam_krb5) by the screen
> > >>    unlock process.
> > >>      
> > > You need a big fat warning somewhere that enabling this option WILL
> > > cause data corruption...
> > >    
> > Why?
> > 
> > Because some process may get the EACCES error half way through it's 
> > operation.
> 
> No. Because the process can receive a reply to the write() syscall that
> indicates that the data is safe, but the EKEYEXPIRED error will cause
> the data to be lost when the client tries to actually commit the data to
> disk.

But on a local disk, a successful return from the write syscall doesn't
mean "the data is safe".  It seems odd to me that NFS should provide
this guarantee while a local disk does not.

Is this guarantee documented anywhere?

Cheers,
-- 
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/