linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] rcu: Drive configuration directly from SMP and PREEMPT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:10:00 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rcu: Drive configuration directly from SMP and
 PREEMPT

On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 13:50 +0100, John Kacur wrote:
> From: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> This commit eliminates the possibility of running TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> when SMP=n and of running TINY_RCU when PREEMPT=y.  People who really
> want these combinations can hand-edit init/Kconfig, but eliminating
> them as choices for production systems reduces the amount of testing
> required.  It will also allow cutting out a few #ifdefs.
> 
> Note that running TREE_RCU and TINY_RCU on single-CPU systems using
> SMP-built kernels is still supported.

With this patch, I can see the need for the first patch (although
there's things broken even for that), but is this really a stable fix?

This looks more of an added feature than a bug fix. It's a bug fix if we
consider running tree_rcu on UP a bug. Or better stated, will it break
anything if we do that?

-- Steve

> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> commit 8008e129dc90ff4f7a56cb033d6bd042afe3ed52 upstream
> Cherry-picked for v3.0-rt and fixed-up merge conflicts
> Note: This makes the depends lines for these options in init/Kconfig for v3.0-rt
> match those for v3.2-rc2-rt3
> Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
> ---
>  init/Kconfig |    6 +++---
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index 89e40a4..5c1147e 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ config TREE_RCU
>  
>  config TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
>  	bool "Preemptible tree-based hierarchical RCU"
> -	depends on PREEMPT
> +	depends on PREEMPT && SMP
>  	help
>  	  This option selects the RCU implementation that is
>  	  designed for very large SMP systems with hundreds or
> @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ config TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
>  
>  config TINY_RCU
>  	bool "UP-only small-memory-footprint RCU"
> -	depends on !SMP && !PREEMPT_RT_FULL
> +	depends on !PREEMPT && !SMP
>  	help
>  	  This option selects the RCU implementation that is
>  	  designed for UP systems from which real-time response
> @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ config TINY_RCU
>  
>  config TINY_PREEMPT_RCU
>  	bool "Preemptible UP-only small-memory-footprint RCU"
> -	depends on !SMP && PREEMPT && !PREEMPT_RT_FULL
> +	depends on PREEMPT && !SMP
>  	help
>  	  This option selects the RCU implementation that is designed
>  	  for real-time UP systems.  This option greatly reduces the


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/