linux-kernel - Re: libperf interface stability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:11:10 +0100
From:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CC:	<mingo@...hat.com>, <eranian@...gle.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	<efault@....de>, <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: libperf interface stability

On 25.11.11 09:46:11, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> 1) get the above list of c files except for util/python.c that is just
> glue stuff for the python binding and make it the new libperf.a
> 
> 2) make a perf.a that just is libperf.a + the rest of the .c files today
> in libperf.a, i.e. perf.a would be the "just for perf tools for now"
> bundle
> 
> 3) make the python binding be just this new libperf.a + util/python.c
> 
> 4) make libperf.so.0.0.1 be just what is in this new libperf.a

Yeah, I was thinking about something like this.

-Robert

-- 
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/