linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:34:19 +0000
From:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree

On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>> Ping?
>
> As I said last time you asked this - the correct merge resolution is to
> pull the DRM updates and mark the staging GMA500 Kconfig "&& BROKEN". The
> staging driver is frozen while we merge outside of staging and will not
> be getting any attention at this point - changes there just mess up the
> move work which is far more important.
>
> Also nothing in staging should be allowed to hold up real work. The
> resolution for anything in staging blocking merges is to mark the staging
> parts && BROKEN IMHO
>

I just pushed jbarnes patch into my tree for now, at pushed out the
mainline gma500 code with it.

But if someone can send a patch to Greg to mark GMA500 broken in
staging that would be good.

Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/