linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 16/62] infiniband: remove the second argument of k[un]map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:45:17 +0800
From:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To:	Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
	Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/62] infiniband: remove the second argument of k[un]map_atomic()

于 2011年11月28日 15:38, Roland Dreier 写道:
> These look fine, given the second argument is unused.  So
>
> Acked-by: Roland Dreier<roland@...estorage.com>
>

Thanks, Roland!

> ... or is there some point when the<linux/highmem.h>  part is
> going in and where it makes sense for me to apply this through
> my tree?
>

I think this patchset should be taken as a whole, so either Andrew
takes them all, or let Stephen to merge my tree[1] to linux-next.

But I don't know if Andrew has different opinions.

1. git://github.com/congwang/linux.git #for-next
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/