| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:24:20 -0500
From: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'Masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com'" <Masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: let trace_signal_generate() report more
info, kill overflow_fail/lose_info
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>[PATCH v2 1/2] tracing: let trace_signal_generate() report more info, kill overflow_fail/lose_info
>
>Incompatible change.
>
>__send_signal()->trace_signal_generate() doesn't report enough info.
>The users want to know was the signal actually delivered or not, and
>they also need the shared/private info.
>
>The patch moves trace_signal_generate() at the end of __send_signal()
>and adds the 2 additional arguments.
>
>This also allows us to kill trace_signal_overflow_fail/lose_info, we
>can simply add the appropriate TRACE_SIGNAL_ "result" codes.
>
Thanks. This looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>
>Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
>---
> include/trace/events/signal.h | 85 +++++++++++------------------------------
> kernel/signal.c | 22 +++++++----
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/trace/events/signal.h b/include/trace/events/signal.h
>index 17df434..2de7208 100644
>--- a/include/trace/events/signal.h
>+++ b/include/trace/events/signal.h
>@@ -23,11 +23,23 @@
> } \
> } while (0)
>
>+#ifndef TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ
>+enum {
>+ TRACE_SIGNAL_DELIVERED,
>+ TRACE_SIGNAL_IGNORED,
>+ TRACE_SIGNAL_ALREADY_PENDING,
>+ TRACE_SIGNAL_OVERFLOW_FAIL,
>+ TRACE_SIGNAL_LOSE_INFO,
>+};
>+#endif
>+
> /**
> * signal_generate - called when a signal is generated
> * @sig: signal number
> * @info: pointer to struct siginfo
> * @task: pointer to struct task_struct
>+ * @group: shared or private
>+ * @result: TRACE_SIGNAL_*
> *
> * Current process sends a 'sig' signal to 'task' process with
> * 'info' siginfo. If 'info' is SEND_SIG_NOINFO or SEND_SIG_PRIV,
>@@ -37,9 +49,10 @@
> */
> TRACE_EVENT(signal_generate,
>
>- TP_PROTO(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *task),
>+ TP_PROTO(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *task,
>+ int group, int result),
>
>- TP_ARGS(sig, info, task),
>+ TP_ARGS(sig, info, task, group, result),
>
> TP_STRUCT__entry(
> __field( int, sig )
>@@ -47,6 +60,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(signal_generate,
> __field( int, code )
> __array( char, comm, TASK_COMM_LEN )
> __field( pid_t, pid )
>+ __field( int, group )
>+ __field( int, result )
> ),
>
> TP_fast_assign(
>@@ -54,11 +69,14 @@ TRACE_EVENT(signal_generate,
> TP_STORE_SIGINFO(__entry, info);
> memcpy(__entry->comm, task->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
> __entry->pid = task->pid;
>+ __entry->group = group;
>+ __entry->result = result;
> ),
>
>- TP_printk("sig=%d errno=%d code=%d comm=%s pid=%d",
>+ TP_printk("sig=%d errno=%d code=%d comm=%s pid=%d grp=%d res=%d",
> __entry->sig, __entry->errno, __entry->code,
>- __entry->comm, __entry->pid)
>+ __entry->comm, __entry->pid, __entry->group,
>+ __entry->result)
> );
>
> /**
>@@ -101,65 +119,6 @@ TRACE_EVENT(signal_deliver,
> __entry->sa_handler, __entry->sa_flags)
> );
>
>-DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(signal_queue_overflow,
>-
>- TP_PROTO(int sig, int group, struct siginfo *info),
>-
>- TP_ARGS(sig, group, info),
>-
>- TP_STRUCT__entry(
>- __field( int, sig )
>- __field( int, group )
>- __field( int, errno )
>- __field( int, code )
>- ),
>-
>- TP_fast_assign(
>- __entry->sig = sig;
>- __entry->group = group;
>- TP_STORE_SIGINFO(__entry, info);
>- ),
>-
>- TP_printk("sig=%d group=%d errno=%d code=%d",
>- __entry->sig, __entry->group, __entry->errno, __entry->code)
>-);
>-
>-/**
>- * signal_overflow_fail - called when signal queue is overflow
>- * @sig: signal number
>- * @group: signal to process group or not (bool)
>- * @info: pointer to struct siginfo
>- *
>- * Kernel fails to generate 'sig' signal with 'info' siginfo, because
>- * siginfo queue is overflow, and the signal is dropped.
>- * 'group' is not 0 if the signal will be sent to a process group.
>- * 'sig' is always one of RT signals.
>- */
>-DEFINE_EVENT(signal_queue_overflow, signal_overflow_fail,
>-
>- TP_PROTO(int sig, int group, struct siginfo *info),
>-
>- TP_ARGS(sig, group, info)
>-);
>-
>-/**
>- * signal_lose_info - called when siginfo is lost
>- * @sig: signal number
>- * @group: signal to process group or not (bool)
>- * @info: pointer to struct siginfo
>- *
>- * Kernel generates 'sig' signal but loses 'info' siginfo, because siginfo
>- * queue is overflow.
>- * 'group' is not 0 if the signal will be sent to a process group.
>- * 'sig' is always one of non-RT signals.
>- */
>-DEFINE_EVENT(signal_queue_overflow, signal_lose_info,
>-
>- TP_PROTO(int sig, int group, struct siginfo *info),
>-
>- TP_ARGS(sig, group, info)
>-);
>-
> #endif /* _TRACE_SIGNAL_H */
>
> /* This part must be outside protection */
>diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
>index b3f78d0..5f130f6 100644
>--- a/kernel/signal.c
>+++ b/kernel/signal.c
>@@ -1025,13 +1025,13 @@ static int __send_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
> struct sigpending *pending;
> struct sigqueue *q;
> int override_rlimit;
>-
>- trace_signal_generate(sig, info, t);
>+ int ret = 0, result;
>
> assert_spin_locked(&t->sighand->siglock);
>
>+ result = TRACE_SIGNAL_IGNORED;
> if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, from_ancestor_ns))
>- return 0;
>+ goto ret;
>
> pending = group ? &t->signal->shared_pending : &t->pending;
> /*
>@@ -1039,8 +1039,11 @@ static int __send_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
> * exactly one non-rt signal, so that we can get more
> * detailed information about the cause of the signal.
> */
>+ result = TRACE_SIGNAL_ALREADY_PENDING;
> if (legacy_queue(pending, sig))
>- return 0;
>+ goto ret;
>+
>+ result = TRACE_SIGNAL_DELIVERED;
> /*
> * fast-pathed signals for kernel-internal things like SIGSTOP
> * or SIGKILL.
>@@ -1095,14 +1098,15 @@ static int __send_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
> * signal was rt and sent by user using something
> * other than kill().
> */
>- trace_signal_overflow_fail(sig, group, info);
>- return -EAGAIN;
>+ result = TRACE_SIGNAL_OVERFLOW_FAIL;
>+ ret = -EAGAIN;
>+ goto ret;
> } else {
> /*
> * This is a silent loss of information. We still
> * send the signal, but the *info bits are lost.
> */
>- trace_signal_lose_info(sig, group, info);
>+ result = TRACE_SIGNAL_LOSE_INFO;
> }
> }
>
>@@ -1110,7 +1114,9 @@ out_set:
> signalfd_notify(t, sig);
> sigaddset(&pending->signal, sig);
> complete_signal(sig, t, group);
>- return 0;
>+ret:
>+ trace_signal_generate(sig, info, t, group, result);
>+ return ret;
> }
>
> static int send_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
>--
>1.5.5.1
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists