linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/25] dynamic_debug: make dynamic-debug supersede DEBUG ccflag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:16:07 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc:	jim.cromie@...il.com, greg@...ah.com, bart.vanassche@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/25] dynamic_debug: make dynamic-debug supersede DEBUG
 ccflag

On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 17:03 -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> I think it's this patach that is causing a lot of "=p" when I boot up
> using a 'make defconfig'.

=p?

>  I'm a bit surprised at how many files have
> 'DEBUG' defined.

Also look for DDEBUG in Makefiles.

> Are we sure that we are setting the 'p' flag for the
> same set of debug statements that would be set if CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG
> were not set?

?

> Also, it seems a bit strange to me, if I now enable all debug statements
> and then clear everything (common pattern, I think), that I'm now
> disabling stuff that was enabled by default.

I don't think that's a common pattern and I
also don't think that's bad.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/