| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 12:16:28 -0500
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jump_label: jump_label for boot options.
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:50:09AM -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:28:18PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 10:40 -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> > > I should probably rename
> > > static_branch() -> 'static_branch_default_false()' to make that clear.
> >
> > The rename doesn't really make sense until you can also provide
> > static_branch_true() also:
>
> I think its just a matter of reversing the true and false returns.
> That is, instead of:
>
> static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch_default_false(struct jump_label_key
> *key)
> {
> asm goto("1:"
> JUMP_LABEL_INITIAL_NOP
> ".pushsection __jump_table, \"aw\" \n\t"
> _ASM_ALIGN "\n\t"
> _ASM_PTR "1b, %l[l_yes], %c0 \n\t"
> ".popsection \n\t"
> : : "i" (key) : : l_yes);
> return false;
> l_yes:
> return true;
> }
>
> We just have (untested):
>
> static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch_default_true(struct jump_label_key
> *key)
> {
> asm goto("1:"
> JUMP_LABEL_INITIAL_NOP
> ".pushsection __jump_table, \"aw\" \n\t"
> _ASM_ALIGN "\n\t"
> _ASM_PTR "1b, %l[l_no], %c0 \n\t"
> ".popsection \n\t"
> : : "i" (key) : : l_no);
> return true;
> l_no:
> return false;
> }
>
> jump_label_inc/dec(), don't need to be changed, they just mean reverse
> the branch on 0, 1 transitions. Although using the same key in both
> static_branch_true, and static_branch_false, might be confusing. Maybe
> we rename jump_label_inc/dec to static_branch_reverse_inc()/dec()?
>
> >
> > > Maybe we need an unbiased static_branch() too, but I'm not sure excatly
> > > how to implement it...
> >
> > I'd think the same way we got in this situation in the first place, go
> > kick some GCC people ;-)
>
> If you think this is a useful case, I'll try and see how to implement it.
> Then we can add static_branch_default_true/false_unbiased() :)
>
> -Jason
Actually, here's a version to imlement static_branch_true/false, that doesn't
touch any arch code.
diff --git a/include/linux/jump_label.h b/include/linux/jump_label.h
index 388b0d4..411cd54 100644
--- a/include/linux/jump_label.h
+++ b/include/linux/jump_label.h
@@ -33,11 +33,16 @@ struct module;
#define JUMP_LABEL_INIT {ATOMIC_INIT(0), NULL}
#endif
-static __always_inline bool static_branch(struct jump_label_key *key)
+static __always_inline bool static_branch_default_false(struct jump_label_key *key)
{
return arch_static_branch(key);
}
+static __always_inline bool static_branch_default_true(struct jump_label_key *key)
+{
+ return !arch_static_branch(key);
+}
+
extern struct jump_entry __start___jump_table[];
extern struct jump_entry __stop___jump_table[];
@@ -68,13 +73,20 @@ static __always_inline void jump_label_init(void)
{
}
-static __always_inline bool static_branch(struct jump_label_key *key)
+static __always_inline bool static_branch_default_false(struct jump_label_key *key)
{
if (unlikely(atomic_read(&key->enabled)))
return true;
return false;
}
+static __always_inline bool static_branch_default_true(struct jump_label_key *key)
+{
+ if (likely(atomic_read(&key->enabled)))
+ return true;
+ return false;
+}
+
static inline void jump_label_inc(struct jump_label_key *key)
{
atomic_inc(&key->enabled);
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 1e9ebe5..05a4f92 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1053,7 +1053,7 @@ perf_sw_event(u32 event_id, u64 nr, struct pt_regs *regs, u64 addr)
{
struct pt_regs hot_regs;
- if (static_branch(&perf_swevent_enabled[event_id])) {
+ if (static_branch_default_false(&perf_swevent_enabled[event_id])) {
if (!regs) {
perf_fetch_caller_regs(&hot_regs);
regs = &hot_regs;
@@ -1067,7 +1067,7 @@ extern struct jump_label_key perf_sched_events;
static inline void perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *task)
{
- if (static_branch(&perf_sched_events))
+ if (static_branch_default_false(&perf_sched_events))
__perf_event_task_sched_in(prev, task);
}
@@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ static inline void perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *prev,
{
perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_CONTEXT_SWITCHES, 1, NULL, 0);
- if (static_branch(&perf_sched_events))
+ if (static_branch_default_false(&perf_sched_events))
__perf_event_task_sched_out(prev, next);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
index df0a779..31c5d64 100644
--- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
+++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static inline void tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(void)
extern struct tracepoint __tracepoint_##name; \
static inline void trace_##name(proto) \
{ \
- if (static_branch(&__tracepoint_##name.key)) \
+ if (static_branch_default_false(&__tracepoint_##name.key))\
__DO_TRACE(&__tracepoint_##name, \
TP_PROTO(data_proto), \
TP_ARGS(data_args), \
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 0e9344a..c818b01 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2129,7 +2129,7 @@ static void update_rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
delta -= irq_delta;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING
- if (static_branch((¶virt_steal_rq_enabled))) {
+ if (static_branch_default_false((¶virt_steal_rq_enabled))) {
u64 st;
steal = paravirt_steal_clock(cpu_of(rq));
@@ -4001,7 +4001,7 @@ void account_idle_time(cputime_t cputime)
static __always_inline bool steal_account_process_tick(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
- if (static_branch(¶virt_steal_enabled)) {
+ if (static_branch_default_false(¶virt_steal_enabled)) {
u64 steal, st = 0;
steal = paravirt_steal_clock(smp_processor_id());
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists