lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:11:22 -0600
From:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To:	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: convert generic-chip to use irq_domain

Shawn,

On 12/11/2011 10:00 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> 
> I installed the patch and played it a little bit, and I some feedback
> below.

Thanks!

> * It breaks some existing irq_chip_generic users like imx5, which
>   is currently numbering irq from 0.  For such users, irq_alloc_descs()
>   will fail because it's asked to search irq #0 starting from irq #1.
>   Yes, I know numbering irq from 0 is a bad idea and really needs to
>   get fixed.  But is it your intention to break such users and force
>   them get fixed with this patch?

I was trying not to break things and allow the existing irq base.

My problem is irq 0-15 are unallocated, 16-159 are the GIC. So when I
try to allocate 8 irqdescs for gpio, I don't really want irq_alloc_descs
to pick 0-15. Ideally we would just globally reserve 0-15 on ARM, but
this will cause problems. So starting at 1 was at least slightly better
than 0.

I think I'll just skip irq_alloc_descs call when the irq_base is >= 0.

> * I thought your patch is taking care of all irqdomain stuff inside
>   irq_chip_generic in a way transparent to its users.  But it really
>   took me some time to figure out that users still need to populate
>   the .of_node for irq_domain encapsulated in irq_chip_generic.

Sorry about that. It would have been evident in my follow on patches for
pl061 gpio.

> * If I understand irq_chip_generic correctly, it only supports up to
>   32 irqs in a chip.  The imx5 tzic supports 128 interrupt lines, and
>   the current driver implements it as 4 generic irq chips.  But from
>   hardware and device tree point of view, it's really just one
>   controller, so we have only one tzic node in dts, and hence we only
>   have the same one .of_node for 4 irq domains.  I'm afraid such
>   implementation will break irq_create_of_mapping()?
>   (For gpio interrupt controller, it should fit perfectly.)
> 

Yeah, that's a problem that needs addressing. You can override the
domain ops with a custom dt_translate function. Perhaps this can be done
generically:

	struct irq_chip_generic *gc;

	list_for_each_entry(gc, &gc_list, list) {
		if (gc->domain != d || d->of_node != controller)
			continue;
		
		// Got a match, fill in data.

		return 0;
	}

	return -EINVAL;


There's still the problem that hwirq is not going to be 0-127 for the
AVIC as you probably want. For that you can initialize hwirq_base for
each domain. The AVIC code is still free to override parts of the domain
setup.

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists