[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:16:50 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] kvm tool: Serial emulation overhaul
On 12/12/2011 01:20 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> > [*] Also, those 10K cycles include some significant Qemu
> > overhead - a couple of thousand cycles - that should be much
> > lower in the tools/kvm case.
>
> Are all the traps going into qemu
Only the ones that go to devices modelled in userspace.
> - is KVM still that braindead ?
How would you do it?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists