[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:27:23 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kumar Sundararajan <kumar@...com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@....EDU>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add a thread cpu time implementation to vDSO
Le lundi 12 décembre 2011 à 13:19 -0800, Arun Sharma a écrit :
> On 12/12/11 12:13 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> >> +
> >> +struct vcpu_data {
> >> + struct vpercpu_data vpercpu[NR_CPUS];
> >> + unsigned int tsc_khz;
> >> + unsigned int tsc_unstable;
> >> +};
> >
> > Thats a showstopper.
> >
> > Try to compile the thing with NR_CPUS=4096 ?
> >
>
> I get a link time error:
>
> ld: section .data..percpu [0000000001ac2000 -> 0000000001ad48ff]
> overlaps section .vvar [0000000001ac0000 -> 0000000001b0083f]
>
> which I consider better than runtime memory corruption :)
>
> I could add a BUILD_BUG_ON() that tries to catch this earlier in the
> compile process.
>
> Re: Fixing the build for NR_CPUS > 64
>
> How about something along the lines of the following:
>
> From: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:13:43 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] Handle NR_CPUS > 64
>
> ---
This only works if CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT=6
Some configurations have 128 bytes cache lines
But really most modern distros have NR_CPUS > 64
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists